Arguments about the
reality of God are mostly misconceived or obsolete, says Ian Harris. It’s time
for a change in perspective.
A black cat in a dark room has
sparked an amusing set of images on questions of faith and reason in the modern
world.
Philosophy, it contends, is looking in a dark room for a black cat. Metaphysics is looking in a dark room for a black cat that isn’t there. Theology is looking in a dark room for a black cat that isn’t there and shouting “I’ve found it!” Science, however, is looking in a dark room for a black cat using a flashlight.
Philosophy, it contends, is looking in a dark room for a black cat. Metaphysics is looking in a dark room for a black cat that isn’t there. Theology is looking in a dark room for a black cat that isn’t there and shouting “I’ve found it!” Science, however, is looking in a dark room for a black cat using a flashlight.
Ah science, we are meant to
conclude. The shining path to enlightenment! The hope of misguided humanity!
Rational, methodical, our only chance of finding that black cat! But the room
is still dark. Maybe that elusive cat isn’t there to be found after all. Maybe
– and this is what I think – it’s the wrong search in the wrong place. So much
of the argument about science and religion, on both sides of the debate, is
misconceived or obsolete.
An ODT correspondent presented
the atheist misconception: “I have never encountered one shred of evidence for
such a being (i.e. God), let alone one who prevents disasters, wars, disease
and misery.”
But what if God is not a being at all? True, the churches build
their rituals on the conviction that “God” has to refer to a someone or
something, real, active, existing, unique, or the whole doctrinal edifice will
totter and fall. But leading-edge Christian thinkers left that notion behind
years ago.
There’s clearly a problem of
interpretation, and it lies with that word “real”. Trying to prove God is real
in a physical sense is a waste of time. So is trying to disprove it. For ideas
of God don’t depend on that physical world. They are generated in the world of
human thought – the same world that gives rise to language and the creativity
of the novelist, dramatist, composer, artist. Is that thought-world not real?
In short, the physical world
does not encompass the whole of what we know to be real. Many things that are
real in human experience can never be subjected to mathematical formulae,
laboratory testing or microscopic analysis – whether you love your husband or
wife, for example, your response to a movie or concerto, a war or a disaster.
Those responses flow from your thought-world and the values you live by, not
science. Would anyone argue they’re not real?
That is the order of reality to
which God-talk belongs. As English novelist Iris Murdoch neatly sums up: “God
does not and cannot exist” (that is, as a separate, objective being). “But what
led us to conceive of him does exist and is constantly experienced and
pictured. What we need is a theology that can continue without God” (again, as
a separate, objective being). In other words, God happens in our heads (or not,
as the case may be). And when God happens in our heads, that experience becomes
part of our subjective reality.
Hence God is best conceived
these days as Presence, a presence that becomes real in the lives of those who
are conscious of it, nurture it, and then live it out in their daily lives.
When that happens, God (or Godness) is real in the world through them – but it
is not the reality of cosmology or physics.
Such an understanding offers
Christians, humanists and atheists (at least those who are not hamstrung by
their respective fundamentalisms) an opportunity to seek common ground on
questions of life, meaning and purpose. It would shift the conversation out of
the world of the physical sciences and into the human thought-world, which is
where religion and the arts belong. The question is not whether God exists, but
how the idea of God functions in that thought-world. There, as Sir Lloyd
Geering reminds us, God symbolically embodies the supreme values that people
feel bound to respond to in their actions.
In Christianity, the highest
value is love. God functions as a poetic symbol for the awe-inspiring mystery
of life. The apostle Paul captures this in the phrase “in God we live and move
and have our being” – again, Presence. God is in us, in our neighbours, even in
our enemies.
God is also the supreme symbol
of connection between ourselves and all humanity, all planetary life, the
universe itself. As such, God provides a pivotal reference point for our whole
experience of life. Reality of that order is a world away from – and infinitely
vaster than – the search for that elusive black cat.
No comments:
Post a Comment