Linda McQuaig Toronto Star November 21, 2012
In the interest of
fighting climate change, most of us avoid buying SUVs —vehicles that aren’t
necessary unless one intends to take the whole family for a spin through
downtown Baghdad. Most of us also recycle and keep the thermostat low. However,
these gestures are doing almost nothing to stop the warming of the planet.
Yet climate change has
disappeared from the political agenda. While the media diligently scrutinize
the security risk posed by a hot relationship between a general and his
biographer, there’s little airtime to consider the security risk posed by
something even hotter: the planet. (A Pentagon-commissioned study in 2003
concluded that global warming would lead to brutal storms, flooding, drought
and widespread human strife. “)
The news on the
climate front is devastating. In a report earlier this month,
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), one of the world’s largest accounting firms,
states the world has “passed the critical threshold” and that current carbon
reductions amount to “a fraction of what is required against the international
commitment to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius.” In order to keep
within that limit by 2050, the accounting firm says the world will have to
dramatically accelerate its annual pace of carbon reduction — to a rate never
before achieved, and then continue at that rate “for 39 consecutive years.” No
problem! That’s if we want to keep warming to just 2 degrees Celsius — which
may be too high. So far, we’ve warmed the planet by only 0.8 degrees Celsius —
and yet that little bit of warming packs quite a punch, as the U.S. east coast
learned last month.
In a brilliant article
in Rolling Stone, Bill McKibben sets out exactly why Big Oil and the rest of
the fossil fuel industry so fiercely resist action to tackle climate change. The
companies currently have proven reserves of oil, gas and coal worth $27
trillion. If the world were to reduce carbon emissions enough to keep the
temperature increase below 2 degrees Celsius, 80 per cent of those reserves
would have to stay in the ground! McKibben notes that this means the fossil
fuel industry would “be writing off $20 trillion in assets” — not something
corporate moguls do, especially when it involves their core business.
One proposed solution
is a “fee-and-dividend” scheme, which would heavily tax fossil fuels and then
return the revenue to the entire population by monthly check, encouraging
everyone to save money by switching to cleaner energy. This would help the
public transition to a greener economy. But it wouldn’t help Big Oil, whose
executives would remain hell-bent on stopping the march of progress — just as
19th-century textile workers fiercely resisted being replaced by spinning
machines. While those workers angrily smashed the machines, the world moved on
to a prosperous new era of large-scale factory production, enabling the public
to enjoy brightly colored cotton calicoes.
The workers, dubbed
Luddites, paid a heavy price for their resistance. They were executed for
destroying the machines, and have been ridiculed throughout history. By contrast,
the Luddites running Big Oil are enjoying the biggest bonanza in history, even
as they block the saving of the planet — a more grievous offense, by any
reckoning, than denying the world the benefits of the spinning machine or even
the calico ball. [Abbrev.]
© 2012 Toronto Star
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1290137--fight-against-climate-change-blocked-by-luddites-at-big-oil-mcquaig
No comments:
Post a Comment