Jim Wallis Sojourners 17 Nov. 2012
The day after the election, Southern Baptist Seminary
President Albert Mohler said, "I think this was an evangelical
disaster." Not really. But it was a
disaster for the religious right, which had again tied its faith to the
partisan political agenda of the Republican Party -- which did lose the
election. But Nov. 6 was an even deeper disaster for the religious right's
leaders, because they will no longer be able to control or easily co-opt the
meaning of the term "evangelical." Just as the 2012 electoral results finally
revealed the demographic transformation of America . It also dramatically demonstrated how the
meaning of the word "evangelical" is being transformed. Evangelical can no longer be accurately used
to mean "white evangelical."
Of the 71 percent (Pew, CNN) of America's Hispanics who
voted for President Barack Obama, the vast majority are either Catholic or
evangelical/Pentecostal. Obama lost the white Catholic vote, but he won
"the Catholic vote" because of Hispanic Catholics. Similarly, Obama
lost the white evangelical vote, but he won the majority of Hispanics who call
themselves evangelical or Pentecostal. Likewise, Obama won 93 percent of the
African-American vote, the majority of whom are members of black churches whose
theology is quite evangelical. And 75 percent of the Asian-American vote, whose
churchgoing members are also mostly evangelical, went for Obama.
So what does all that tell us? Very simply, the majority of
the white evangelicals went for Gov. Romney, and the majority of the non-white
evangelicals voted for President Obama. Obama also won 60 percent of younger voters
(ages 18-29). If demographics changed
this election, they have also changed the meaning of the term
"evangelical."
Religious right leaders like Franklin Graham did everything
they could to turn evangelicals to Romney, especially in the final run-up to
the election. Their efforts to turn concerns about abortion and gay marriage
into partisan arguments for a Republican victory -- and to threaten dangerous
consequences of a Democratic win -- were, by their own estimates, the most
extensive ever. But they failed and didn't change the outcome of the election.
While most evangelicals are still "pro-life,"
abortion is not their only concern. Not all are convinced that Republicans have
the best answers to all the life issues. While most evangelicals are strongly
committed to strengthening family life, not all think equal rights for gay and
lesbian people are a threat to the family. Poverty reduction, immigration
reform, a consistent life ethic, the creation care of environmental protection,
a less militaristic foreign policy, and a deep commitment to racial and
economic justice are all issues of concern.
It's time to tell the media to change its terminology, and
take account of all the "evangelicals." And it's time to describe the
broader list of "moral" and "biblical" issues that
evangelicals care about. This is a new, diverse coalition for a new America --
and a changing evangelical demographic is a central part of that. The narrow
conservatism of the religious right's white evangelicals is simply not a faith
to and for that new evangelical world.
Evangelical is a theological commitment, not a political
one. It's about the centrality of Christ and the authority of the Bible. It's
following Jesus and our obedience to the Scriptures that leads us to defend the
poor, protect the most vulnerable, welcome the stranger, seek racial
reconciliation and justice, and be good stewards of the environment and
peacemakers in a world of war. Those
commitments will always challenge politics, but they should never be partisan.
Democrats should not make the same mistake that Republicans did in believing
they have any permanent voting bloc. The policies and priorities of political
parties and leaders should be and will be examined by the faith agenda of the
community we call the body of Christ.
[Abridged]
Jim Wallis is CEO
of Sojourners
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-wallis/the-new-evangelical-agend_b_2137388.html
No comments:
Post a Comment